Identify legal exposure, SEO degradation, and user experience barriers in minutes. Run a structured WCAG 2.2 AA screening across your most important pages — no account required.
Free executive summary included. Detailed remediation report available.
Enter your domain to run a structured WCAG 2.2 AA accessibility screening across up to 10 high-priority pages.
This assessment evaluates:
Powered by industry-standard automated accessibility engines.
ADA-related digital accessibility lawsuits continue to rise annually. Organizations without proactive compliance efforts face increasing litigation risk.
Semantic structure, heading hierarchies, and alt text directly influence how search engines crawl and rank your content. Accessibility and SEO share foundational signals.
Clear navigation, readable content, and accessible forms improve task completion rates for all users — not just those using assistive technology.
An accessible website signals operational maturity and commitment to quality. Inaccessibility signals the opposite to prospects and partners.
Enterprise procurement increasingly requires VPAT documentation and WCAG compliance. Without it, you may not make the shortlist.
Over 1 billion people worldwide live with some form of disability. Excluding this audience is both a moral and revenue decision.
Accessibility is foundational infrastructure — not a feature you add later.
Digital accessibility lawsuits continue to rise annually in the United States. Courts have consistently ruled that websites are places of public accommodation under the Americans with Disabilities Act.
Proactive accessibility assessment reduces exposure and demonstrates good-faith compliance efforts. Accessibility is no longer optional infrastructure.
Overlay tools may modify front-end presentation, but they do not address the root causes of accessibility failures. True accessibility requires structural remediation — not cosmetic overlays.
Overlay widgets do not:
Our audit identifies foundational issues within your codebase and content architecture — the issues that overlays leave untouched.
This automated screening evaluates your website against industry-standard WCAG 2.2 AA criteria across multiple dimensions of accessibility:
WCAG 2.2 is the latest version of the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines, published by the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C). Level AA conformance is the standard most commonly referenced in legal proceedings, procurement requirements, and organizational accessibility policies.
WCAG 2.2 builds on previous versions by adding criteria for target sizing, focus appearance, and dragging alternatives — addressing common barriers encountered on modern web applications. Organizations targeting WCAG 2.2 AA compliance are aligning with the most current international accessibility standard.
The guidelines are organized around four principles: Perceivable, Operable, Understandable, and Robust (POUR). Each success criterion addresses a specific barrier that prevents users with disabilities from accessing web content effectively.
Any organization with a public-facing website should understand its accessibility posture. This is particularly important for organizations in regulated industries, those serving diverse customer bases, and companies pursuing enterprise partnerships where accessibility documentation is a procurement requirement.
Marketing teams, product managers, and development leads benefit from accessibility assessments during website redesigns, CMS migrations, and platform launches. Understanding your baseline compliance posture before a major initiative prevents costly remediation later.
E-commerce platforms, educational institutions, healthcare providers, SaaS companies, and financial services organizations face elevated risk profiles and should prioritize accessibility assessment as part of their standard quality assurance processes.
Search engine crawlers and assistive technologies interpret web content through similar mechanisms. Proper heading hierarchies, descriptive image alt text, semantic HTML elements, and logical document structures improve both accessibility and search engine understanding of your content.
Accessible websites tend to have faster load times, lower bounce rates, and higher engagement metrics — all indirect ranking signals. Structured data, ARIA landmarks, and clean HTML contribute to how effectively search engines can extract and represent your content in search results, featured snippets, and AI-generated answers.
Google has explicitly stated that accessibility is not a direct ranking factor, but the technical foundations of accessibility (semantic markup, page structure, mobile usability, and content clarity) overlap significantly with established ranking signals. Improving one typically improves the other.
Automated accessibility testing tools like axe-core evaluate HTML structure against defined rule sets and can identify issues such as missing alt text, improper heading levels, insufficient contrast ratios, and ARIA misuse. These tools are fast, repeatable, and effective for catching a significant class of violations.
However, automated tools typically identify only 30–40% of accessibility issues. Complex interactions, dynamic content, cognitive accessibility concerns, and context-dependent judgments require human evaluation. For example, an automated tool can verify that alt text exists but cannot determine whether it meaningfully describes the image content.
The most effective accessibility strategy combines automated screening for continuous monitoring with periodic manual audits for comprehensive evaluation. This assessment provides the automated foundation — a starting point for understanding your compliance posture and prioritizing remediation efforts.
This tool performs automated WCAG 2.2 Level A and AA screening using axe-core, an industry-standard accessibility testing engine. It evaluates image alt text, heading structure, ARIA role usage, form labeling, keyboard navigation, target sizing, landmark regions, and more across up to 10 pages on your domain.
Automated tools identify approximately 30-40% of accessibility issues. This assessment provides a strong starting point for understanding your compliance posture. Full WCAG 2.2 AA compliance requires manual testing including keyboard navigation testing, screen reader evaluation, and cognitive accessibility review. We recommend pairing automated screening with a professional accessibility audit.
The score is calculated from the ratio of passed accessibility checks to total checks, weighted by violation severity. Critical violations carry higher penalties than minor ones. A single critical violation caps the score below 80 regardless of other results, reflecting the outsized risk that critical issues represent.
Critical issues represent barriers that prevent users from accessing content entirely and may create legal exposure. Major issues create significant usability friction and affect SEO performance. Minor issues are structural best-practice improvements that enhance the overall user experience.
Search engines and accessibility standards share foundational requirements: proper heading hierarchies, descriptive alt text, semantic HTML structure, and logical document outlines. Accessible websites tend to have better crawlability, clearer content signals, and stronger user engagement metrics — all of which influence search rankings.
We recommend running an automated screening after every major site update, content redesign, or CMS migration. For ongoing compliance, quarterly automated assessments paired with an annual manual audit provide strong coverage. Continuous integration testing with axe-core during development is the most proactive approach.
This tool fetches your page HTML and evaluates it against WCAG rules in a server-side environment. It does not test on physical devices or with assistive technologies. For complete validation, results should be supplemented with real-device testing using screen readers, keyboard-only navigation, and mobile accessibility evaluation.
The downloadable PDF includes a cover page, executive summary with your health score and risk level, ADA litigation context, a detailed risk breakdown table with WCAG references, page-by-page findings with remediation guidance, accessibility-SEO correlation analysis, and a phased remediation roadmap prioritized by severity.
Don't wait for a lawsuit or a failed procurement review to address accessibility. Our team builds accessible, search-optimized digital infrastructure that compounds brand authority.
This assessment represents an automated accessibility screening and does not constitute legal certification of ADA or WCAG compliance. Results are generated using industry-standard automated tools and should be validated through manual testing for full compliance verification. This tool does not provide legal advice.